One workflow. A clear next decision.
Manual bank portal not observed
Decision requested
Review the finding and agree the next change with the workflow owner.
Next step: Obtain redacted records or document how this path is governed before concluding coverage.
What was reviewed
1 mapped obligations, 3 declared paths, 4 supplied events.
Declared paths: Original processor (captured); Backup processor (captured); Manual bank portal (unobserved)
Priority: No execution records are supplied for Manual bank portal.
route_id: bank-portal
CI mode: gate. Diagnostic exit 3; process exit 3.
Continue with the free checks
- Retain this result with its declared paths and evidence limits.
- Add missing records or reconcile conflicting outcomes; a successful advisory run does not resolve an evidence gap.
No purchase required.
Validate one actual workflow
- Do all actual paths, including manual bank portals, use the decision under review?
- Who verifies final closure evidence and maps the same obligation across paths?
- Who owns the next change, and when must a release decision be made?
These questions require evidence from the actual workflow. A synthetic match or incomplete history cannot answer them.
Keep these limits attached
- Findings are bounded by the supplied records or synthetic contexts; counts are not monetary losses.
- Obligation mapping and final-evidence labels are operator assertions, not authenticated facts.
- No payment is executed, blocked, signed, or authorized. Production protection is not established.
Optional paid workflow assessment
Use this when one actual workflow needs a scoped review of its paths, evidence, and execution boundary. Agree the owner, evidence, fee, and deliverables first.
Deliverables: workflow readout, one page of findings and next steps, and supporting records. Shadow evaluation has no payment authority; enforcement requires technical validation and customer approval.
Discuss a workflow assessment. This link does not attach or upload the report.